Curse

S4br3t00th · Mar 10, 2011, 11:25 AM // 11:25

/signed

have the people who had LDoA the old way have it changed to:
"I suck so much that charr would kill me for hours straight all night long, and this for several months, without caring for the ludicrous elecric bill, of Ascalon"

of course it would be forced on display because people would be so damn proud of it...

same with "I turned in all my kath hammers or mashed "8" before the embark update"

I mean... those were such awesome achievements, people just deserve the credit...

Kojima · Mar 10, 2011, 12:20 PM // 12:20

/not signed.

What kind of suggestion is that?

dasmitchies · Mar 10, 2011, 12:47 PM // 12:47

I got LS and Drunkard the good old fashioned way and I am certain nobody playing cares. It is all irrelevant. The titles changed so GW players had something to return for. Play the game if you are enjoying it. If not, delete it off your hard drive and do something else. I have yet to have a single other players actions affect my PVE play to any importance. It is a game, not a military uniform.

Arduin · Mar 10, 2011, 01:23 PM // 13:23

I don't care about the achievements of others and I don't care what other people think of my achievements.

My New Name · Mar 10, 2011, 03:20 PM // 15:20

who would even do those things lol
/notsigned

Reformed · Mar 10, 2011, 03:33 PM // 15:33

Titles are fine, just fix this new LDoA so that it isn't so piss easy to finish. /notsigned

Aldric · Mar 10, 2011, 05:12 PM // 17:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by GWfan#1

/deaths (character name) will allow a player to lookup how many times another player has died.
/drunk (character name) will allow a player to lookup the amount of time another player has been drunk. 10,000+ minutes would show an old school drunkard.

I find it sad that anyone would care as much to actually want to look this up upon seeing another player with a title on.

I get teh whole epeen concept for exceptionally rare skins etc but i just dont understand the amount of whining people are doing because they think some titles got easier and its not fair on them/veterans/oldskoolers.

/notsigned (alot)

Asia Skyly · Mar 10, 2011, 06:36 PM // 18:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Del

People need to cut out this epeen bullshit.

/notsigned

Quoted for Truth!

/notsigned

Sir Mad · Mar 10, 2011, 06:53 PM // 18:53

/not signed

I don't have anything against the idea itself, but people would never use this command (or even hear about it).

vader · Mar 10, 2011, 07:19 PM // 19:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aeronwen

Makes you wonder why it took them so many years to change it then!

I would guess the Guild Wars 2 Legacy is what caused them to change the titles. That's now two more statues per person that are much easier to obtain.

MithranArkanere · Mar 10, 2011, 10:40 PM // 22:40

The only thing I would do is applying a time stamp to titles.

More that just getting it, being the first one that got it has more merit.

But since it's too late to add such timestamp in GW1, it should be left for GW2.

Black Metal · Mar 11, 2011, 04:12 AM // 04:12

/unsigned

and this comes from someone who already did the alc title the old fashioned way (as in, I clicked every one myself, didn't use a program, didn't do the zone trick, no timer)

they changed the title to fix something they didn't like, so they are certainly not going to go back on that

also, I very much doubt the game has a way of distinguishing who got their alc and ldoa title which way

GWfan#1 · Mar 11, 2011, 05:33 AM // 05:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

The only thing I would do is applying a time stamp to titles.

More that just getting it, being the first one that got it has more merit.

But since it's too late to add such timestamp in GW1, it should be left for GW2.

That is a pretty interesting idea.

The Only Warrior · Mar 11, 2011, 05:46 AM // 05:46

why not just "/hero" to look at thier Hero Tab with Age+Death on it. add a button for this instead imo. put skills on that too, sick of noobs QQing cause they asked to ping.

Hobbs · Mar 11, 2011, 07:51 AM // 07:51

LOL.

As an IAH (the old way) why would I care how I got it? I just did it for GWAMM not because it shows how good/bad/committed I am. Also, why the hell would anyone else care how I got it enough for them too look it up?

It's not like i'm gonna get into a heated argument about what method I used to drink pixellated beer which can only be solved by a /drunk...

This is even more daft than the idea of splitting the titles.

/notsigned

GWfan#1 · Mar 12, 2011, 03:33 AM // 03:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hobbs

I just did it for GWAMM not because it shows how good/bad/committed I am.

You say you did it for GWAMM, what is the meaning of GWAMM to you then? I hope it was not to show how "good/bad/committed" you are.

Lasai · Mar 12, 2011, 04:14 AM // 04:14

no way.

would you then add /hammers and /kilroy as well to check survivors?

/keyspurchased to check Z titles?

/leached to check EotN rank?

Honestly now.. I am the only one that should care about how I did anything.

GWfan#1 · Mar 12, 2011, 04:30 AM // 04:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lasai

Honestly now.. I am the only one that should care about how I did anything.

With this reasoning I suppose we should not care about gold buyers and botters either.

Why should we care how botters consistently rupt 1/4 spells?

The fact of the matter is people do care.

chris12xu · Mar 12, 2011, 04:55 AM // 04:55

you cant compare botting to a title change so don't even go there

epeen =/= significant in game advantage

Del · Mar 12, 2011, 05:19 AM // 05:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by GWfan#1

With this reasoning I suppose we should not care about gold buyers and botters either.

Why should we care how botters consistently rupt 1/4 spells?

The fact of the matter is people do care.

Hyperbole and generally inaccurate comparisons don't sway an argument in your favor.